So wait…you’re going to tell me that the savage and brutal method employed to end this innocent little girl’s life, was done by a pedophile/murderer, who was able to sneak into the house, conveniently through the basement window that was broken and didn’t lock. It also had a suitcase sitting below it for the monster to step on on his way in. Then, snuck from the basement, all the way upstairs and just happened to know what room was her. Then somehow he was able to enter the bedroom, using his apparent legendary ninja skills, grab her while she slept and prevented her from even making a peep. He transported her from upstairs to the basement without her or him making a single sound for anyone to hear. He then rapes her but leaves no DNA evidence behind except for the touch DNA discussed above. He strangles her so savagely that the rope was embedded in her skin! Then, to make sure she was dead, smashes her in the skull so hard it split her entire skull open! Also, at some point in all of this, instead of writing a ransom letter before all of this and bringing it along, the monster took the time to find a tablet in the house and write a several page ransom letter?! We know this because a tablet was found in the Ramsey home that had pages torn from it that matched the pages of the ransom letter. I refer to it a a letter because this was not simply a “we have your daughter, give us money” note. This was a several page instruction manual detailing everything the Ramsey’s had to do tio ensure the safe return of their already dead daughter. Another very intriguing fact is that the ransom amount demanded was the exact amount, down to the dollar, of the Christmas Bonus John Ramsey had gotten just prior to this happening. Does any of this make sense yet? What kind of pedophile/ murderer, whom would appear to be a professional and has done this before, is that confident in his skills, that he takes the time to find a pen and paper around the house, sit down, and write out a several page ransom letter, leaving himself exposed for several minutes, either before or after he sneaks upstairs, kidnaps JonBenet without a peep, takes her to the basement, rapes her, savagely strangles her then splits her skull open? Even to someone who has no law enforcement experience can see that this theory makes absolutely no sense at all! The question that arises to me, and should to you as well, is : who would be comfortable in a home to be able to take the immense amount of time to do all of these things AND know where everything was located in order to accomplish his goal (I say “his” because the DNA tested was found to belong to a man)? The DNA is a Red Herring in this case just like the Ransom was. John Ramsey is a very accomplished man with an impeccable reputation. He isn’t one to do something without having a plan. If he was, he wouldn’t be the self made multi-millionaire that he is and has been for years.
Here’s what I think happened: John Ramsey was molesting Jon Benet her whole life but now she was getting older and started to realize that what was happening was wrong and one night he took her to the basement to do his disgusting act but she said no and threatened to tell a teacher/priest and wouldn’t allow him to have his way. John Ramsey was a self made multi-millionaire. He had a flawless reputation and a perfect public image to maintain. Had Jon Benet revealed his secret, he’d be disgraced in the worst way imaginable and lose everything and THAT is why the murder was so brutal and savage…his mind set is “how dare you think you can ruin me” and after strangling her, he bashed in his little girl’s head to make sure she would never reveal his secret. As for the touch dna…that wasn’t found, obviously, until AFTER he had found her in the basement and spent time with her there and then brought her upstairs where several people were present, any one of which could have contaminated the crime scene. The DNA is a red herring. It’s not the key to this case. There is no way some stranger snuck around some family’s property, which was lit up all over with Christmas lights, and so perfectly pulled off this lengthy and ridiculously drawn out atrocity, snuck around a dark house looking for a tablet and a pen, wrote a several page ransom note for a child he not only has killed already but was also not even hidden well in the basement of their own home, did this whole thing AND left DNA behind, but has never been, either before or in the almost 20 years since, linked to any other crime?! This murder is a classic example of a very personal kill. To strangle someone is to be down, in their face, watching them gasp for air. Their eyes locked on yours, trying to kick, scratch,survive. The fact that the rope was embedded in her skin shows that there was a lot of anger and hatred involved. Strangling someone isn’t like you see on TV or in movies. It is a long, agonizing experience for the one being strangled. It could take up to 10 minutes for someone to finally succumb by strangulation. In this case, it probably didn’t take more than a minute or two, but think about that. It may not seem like a lot, but grab a teddy bear and squeeze him as hard as you can and count the second go by…it’s a lot longer than you would think. All the while, 6 year old JonBenet, is struggling to breath, trying to plead for her life, but not words can come out. Then, to ensure she is dead and cannot tell his “secret,” he bashes her skull so hard that it splits open…if she wasn’t dead before, she is now. After the adrenaline goes away and reality starts to set in, John is/was remorseful for committing this heinous crime. This is proven by the fact that, after she was sexually assaulted, the murderer had the “decency” to put her underwear and leggins back on because he did not want her found in such a “vulnerable” and derogatory position. The covering up of her body with the blanket also shows remorse in that he couldn’t bare the image of what he did. There have been many, many murderers convicted in this country on far less circumstantial evidence that is present in this case. The Bolder Police are either one of the most inept police departments in the United States or there is a conspiracy between the Ramsey’s and them to focus the attention elsewhere. Days after the murder of JonBenet, the Ramsey’s packed their belonging and moved across the country. Their reason was because they couldn’t bare to live in the house where their daughter was savagely murdered. In any other case, this would add to the suspicion of the involvement of one of the family members and, to the media at that time, it did; but not to the police. In my opinion, John Ramsey is a closet monster. The reason the DNA won’t ever match a suspect is because it does not belong to the killer but is actually a result of a sloppy police investigation and contamination of the crime scene. If you watch any of the few interviews they gave, you will see it is Patsy doing most of the talking. Patsy was the family spokesperson. She was experienced in being in the spotlight, both when she was younger and in her older age by letter her daughter compete in beauty pageants in which she is dressed very suggestively and, quite frankly, inappropriate for a girl her age. When John spoke, he was very short but also very suspicious. When asked by Barbra Walters whether he thought the DNA would prove his innocence, his body language and his answer are both very suspect. Instead of saying “absolutely because i did not kill my daughter,” he pauses and, for a brief second, he shakes his head, as if his body language is saying “no because i am not innocent,” then proceeds to say that he believes it will lead to the killer. He has a chance to shout his innocence on Prime Time television, yet his body language is what gives him away. In another interview, Walters asks him if he murdered his daughter. After watching him talk several times during the interview, he always looked straight forward and made eye contact. After being asked this question, he replies “no” however as he is saying it, he closes his eyes, kind of like a long blink, as if when he is saying no, he isn’t making eye contact because he is a liar. It is also interesting to note that 2 days after finding JonBenet dead, the Ramsey’s hired an attorney and refused to talk to the police BUT they had NO PROBLEM taking to the television to do interviews and plea for information on the killer, all the while the killer was sitting right there in front of us all. The entire case became a spectacle. Tabloids ran wild with all the crazy stories and theories. Patsy Ramsey was back in the spotlight and loved every second of it until the day she died. i fully believe Patsy knew that John was molesting and murdered JonBenet. That is why uou see her doing most of the talking. She was used to having an audience to captivate and boy did she pull the wool over everyone’s eyes. I wouldn’t doubt her telling John to keep his mouth shut unless asked a question and to answer it as short and to the point as possible as to not end up incriminating himself.